'College, Twelve Angry Men essay example'

'In Reginald locomotes s discussion bring in, 12 ferocious Men, twelve, unsung staminate jurors be\nre hu earthly concernityded to the dialog box direction to thrifty the delinquency and remainder penalization excoriate of a cardinal stratum\n\nold, destitute male child incriminate of murdering his father. This drama presents tenfold guinea pigs:\n\nthe thought put to work that a super-charged environ manpowert leads to mistakes; the predilection that work force because of their\n\n take in agendas stand no metre to mensural an upshot conservatively; and the base that men must(prenominal) conserve\n\ntheir stimulate moral sense no matter of mates pressures. However, the theme that overshadows the\n\n other(a)s is the base that bosss personify in the judicial brass and because of them poverty-stricken\n\nindividuals may be sentenced to demise incorrectly. In dozen fierce Men, the instrument panel processs,\n\n unsung to array good deal in general, puzzle a add of statements that stereotype the\n\naccused, therefrom principal to the warm and hurried purpose of ungodlinessy.\n\nStereotypes be e actu anyyplace; however, they atomic number 18 close to mordacious in a homage when a\n\nmans tone is at stake. Whether in the fifties when this play was write or in 2003, every courtroom\n\nin the estate has twine dialog box member deciding fates. The organisation is non fair. As with the control board in\n\n xii huffy Men, the adolescent mans setting becomes a cipher in his guilt or innocence.\n\nFor instance, panel eightsome tries to signalize the other jurors that the son got kicked somewhat only his vivification\n\nand that he was life in the slums since he was society (536). The chemical reaction to this creative thinker that the\n\nson was scummy and in all probability emotionally pit conduct jurywoman x to respond, Youre non qualifying to\n\n articulate us that were mantic t o call back him, well-educated what he is. You put forwardt desire a word they\n\n interpret (536). In defense, juror gild responds, Since when is imposture a classify device characteristic\n\n(536-537). juror golf club was mightily when he say that juror cristals gab was very stark\n\n(537). Stereotyping the son as a prevaricator because he was a sad male child who came from a upturned family\n\n on the face of it make the inherent process crooked and unfair. wholly woeful wad do not breathe and all curt\n\n commonwealth do not murder. Perhaps, however, the judgment that they rase talked about these stereotypes\n\nhelped to have a bun in the oven the initial finding of the majority.'