Home Food VS Fast Food Essay

Homemade nutrient is often breeded as a privilege. Low cost of de graded food and its nutrition value acquire a solution for many families who get neither clipping non money to cook at home. Warnings that stead unfluctuating food is not heavy do not stop Americans who treat it as an essential agency of their daily diet. As a result, the prevalence of obese and overweight mint plummets. If we look at what is behind attractive pricing strategies and delicious tastes offered at fast food chains, all(a) facts support the idea that homemade food is a violate choice. The articles _Is Junk Food Really Cheaper?_ by simoleons Bittman and _Fast Food Versus Slow Food_ by Nancy Folbre provide enough facts to motivate tribe to cook at home. Out of these two articles, Folbres specific come on to argumentation makes her writing extremely persuasive and logical advocating cookery at home.One of the biggest advantages of fast food is that it is really fast. People do not spend much ma gazine ordering their food and eating it on the go. People tend to work to a greater extent and cook slight than they apply to 50 years ago (Folbre). Technological development simplify populates attitude to food and formulation all they pack is to wake up their meals in the microwave oven. Moreover, accessibility of fast food restaurants is becoming better and better. Contrary to this, homework at home seems less attractive referable to the routine related to this process. Grocery shopping, cooking, cleaning up, and developing cooking skills be required. Because time is the most pricy thing in the world, not all spate atomic number 18 ready to spend it on cooking. ManyAmericans treat cooking as a job and they be confused that they be not paid for it. Complaints of many Americans about lack of time for cooking be common however, the popularity of food expresss is on the peak (Folbre). Instead of cooking, hoi polloi prefer to watch how others cook.According to Bittman, there are five fast food restaurants per each supermarket in the United States. If peck eat at fast food restaurants, they forget about such chores as cooking and cleaning up and have more(prenominal) time to relax afterwards work. Overall, it is difficult to argue that fast food restaurants are not convenient. In fact, they are action-saving for many battalion who work long hours and have no time to care about what they eat. Bittman states that average American family watches TV 1.5 hours a day it means that they have enough free time. They lack motivating to cook and use affordability argument to convince others that their behavior is right. A potent belief that cooking at home is pricey stops community from researching the start in detail. Many of them even do not submit to cook at home before they complain that it requires much money.Folbre uses a strong and persuasive argument to prove that home food is not as expensive as people think about it. She finds that peopl e need 30 minutes to cook a burger at home. This time includes time spent on shopping, washing up, cooking, and serving. While an average burger cost around $4, the cost of ingredients for a burger is $1. Folbre states that 30 minutes spent on cooking can be easily compared to driving to a fast food restaurant or standing in line to procure a burger. Homemade burgers become even more affordable is they are cooked for the family because it still takes a bit more than 30 minutes and four burgers are ready as a result. Folbres experiment proves that people can afford to eat at home and it can be economical for their budget. However, time spent on cooking is the reason why many people prefer to eat out.Additionally, fast food is expensive according to both Bittman and Folbre, purely organic food is also very expensive because it requires special care and conditions to be produced. At the same time, fast food and organic food are two extremes there are many other food products which a re not tooexpensive and healthy. Bittman challenges affordability argument providing a list of alternatives which are budget-friendly. Rice with a naive salad costs less than McDonalds dinner. It does not require developed cooking skills and much time to be ready. There are many TV-shows, YouTube impart and cook books which offer a number of different recipes for all life occasions. Cooking can be fun if people stop perceiving it as a chore. Bittman tries to catch the issue as a whole as a result, his article complexly argues for home food benefits.Nutrition value of fast food is high poor people conceptualize that they need calories and eagerly consume fries and soda drinks. According to Bittman, Americans consume more calories they need a day as a result, it leads to health issue related to weight gain. Fast food is addictive even when people are full, they feel hungry after a season. There are special chemicals and flavors added to fast food to intensify its taste and make it craved for people. Ordinary home food contains less fat and sugar which makes it more useful for people. People who cook at home always drive in what ingredients they use to cook their meal which allows them making healthier choices. Also, it is very several(a) and all people can find something simple to cook only delicious.In summary, both writers agree that people who experience lack of time and money often eat at fast food restaurants because they believe that it is cheaper than cooking at home. Some of them complain that they do not have time to cook daily. People always have time solely set different priorities some of them prefer to watch TV in the evening and it is their choice. While Bittman tries to persuade people making his argument global, Folbre focuses on the economic side of the issue and creates a solid line of argumentation.I like this specific approach to persuasion more than generalizations sprinkled by ergodic statistics in Bittmans article. Folbre successful ly proves her point of view with the help of her experiment she rationally counts money and time spent of home cooking to show that it can be economical and fast. Her research persuades me that cooking can be economical showing real examples in life situations. Bittman only lists alternatives while Folbre uses them and checks their relevance. Moreover, itcan be healthier, more nutritious and delicious. Home food contains less sugar and fat while fat is the main source of calories in fast food. People need to try and decide what is better for their health, schedule, and purse. kit and boodle CitedBittman, Mark Is Junk Food Really Cheaper Everythings an Argument with Readings. Ed. Andrea A. Lunsford, fundament J. Ruszkiewicz, and Keith Walters. 6th ed. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 2013. 660-665. Print.Folbre, Nancy. Fast Food Versus Slow Food. _The_ _New York Times._ July 29, 2013. Web. July 24, 2014.